如題

好似聽日個場開始
唔肯定:ppp:
:ppp:

舉中指停一場, 對找卡數停

至於之前停8場就因為仍處上訴期所以未執行:loveliness:

唉! 都証據確鑿 仲咩仲上訴:tttt:

:zzzzzzzzz:

從來冇證據確過:fff::fff:

艾夫拿一樣證據確鑿,但乜事都無:iiiii: :zzz:

之前巴利迪利條Twitter:yyy::yyy:

明串老廢:zzz:

(4) Mr Evra was a credible witness. He gave his evidence in a calm, composed and
clear way. It was, for the most part, consistent, although both he and Mr Suarez
were understandably unable to remember every detail of the exchanges between
them (paragraphs 229 to 234 above).


(5) Mr Suarez's evidence was unreliable in relation to matters of critical importance.
It was, in part, inconsistent with the contemporaneous evidence, especially the
video footage. For example, Mr Suarez said that he pinched Mr Evra's skin in an
attempt to defuse the situation. He also said that his use of the word "negro" to
address Mr Evra was conciliatory and friendly. We rejected that evidence. To describe his own behaviour in that way was unsustainable and simply incredible
given that the players were engaged in an acrimonious argument. That this was
put forward by Mr Suarez was surprising and seriously undermined the
reliability of his evidence on other matters (paragraphs 235 to 267 above). There
were also inconsistencies between his accounts given at different times as to
what happened (paragraphs 282 to 318).


FA 你真係抵俾人抽水:kkkkk:

所以尋晚費SIR以主場輸俾包尾作為禮物:gggg:

原告都可以做到可靠證人:yyy:

原告同證人一手包辦, 被告想唔死都幾難 :yyy:

[ 本帖最後由 駿先鋒 於 1/1/2012 11:29 PM 編輯 ]

蘇亞雷斯唔上訴:sss:

成個1月都見唔到佢lu:sss: :sss:

艾夫拿吊蘇9先既, 然後我諗只有傻仔被人吊完先會乜都唔做, 還拖反串番艾夫拿其實係好人之常情

其實咁樣互噴根本好少事, 根本就唔駛調咩查
只係一談到種族歧視, FA就大條道理咁話要重罰

但是呢個世界上有好多人都唔明, 真正的種族歧視根本就唔係用把口講出黎, 而是用行動做出黎來的, 白眼, 語中帶刺等等

真係用把口罵果D其實只是D人太無聊, 唔講野唔得, 先狂噴垃圾話而已
好多人唔講野, 但咪又係一樣係個心度歧視你係黑鬼OR你係白人OR你係華人咁
呢D先真正係賤人:hhhh:
蘇9今次用口說話, 蝕底既梗係佢LA