結果出左..都係 Fined
O'Brien Fined 5000 ..Murtagh,O'Donoghue在英國停7日賽..Arc 可以照跑
Aidan O'Brien was hit with a £5,000 fine and jockeys Johnny Murtaghand Colm O'Donoghue suspended from racing for seven days after fallingfoul of the 'team tactics' rule in the Juddmonte International Stakeswon by Duke Of Marmalade at Newmarket last month.
Although the raceday stewards found no breach, subsequentinvestigations by the British Horseracing Authority called intoquestion a move by O'Donoghue aboard Red Rock Canyon.
The trio declined to comment after a disciplinary panel hearing incentral London on Thursday, but BHA public relations manager PaulStruthers said: "As all parties have seven days from the receipt of thepanel's reasons to appeal, it would be inappropriate to comment ontoday's proceedings.
"However, I would like to stress that in reaching their conclusionsthe panel made clear that there was no attempt to cheat, simply thatthe breaches occurred due to ignorance of the details of the rule inquestion."
Although the dates for the riders' suspensions have yet to beannounced, Murtagh and O'Donoghue will be free to ride in the QatarPrix de l'Arc de Triomphe as no Flat racing takes place in Britain thatday.
O'Donoghue admitted he was guilty of a breach of Rule 153 (iv) whichstates: "a rider shall not make a manoeuvre in a race in the interestof another horse in common ownership...whether or not such a manoeuvrecaused interference or caused his horse to fail to achieve the bestpossible placing".
The rule covering such a manoeuvre was amended in March 2007following an similar inquiry six months previously where Ballydoylewere exonerated from any wrong-doing in the Queen Elizabeth II Stakesat Ascot.
Although not clear of the exact nature of the rule, O'Brien passionately stressed to the panel that he was "paranoid" about the useof pacemakers following the QEII inquiry.
He said: "We use pacemakers to make an even gallop and not to hinder or favour any other horse.
"The last thing we want is to win any race anywhere if it wasunfavourably won. We would prefer not to win any of those Group Ones ifthey were won unfavourably and they would not mean anything to us."
His legal representative, John Kelsey-Fry QC, added: "No Group Onerace in the world is as important to Aidan than his integrity."
The panel heard how Murtagh and O'Donoghue discussed theInternational beforehand while walking the course, and O'Brien replied"absolutely not" when asked if he had been party to any decision madeabout Red Rock Canyon moving off the rail.
After the race, he was quoted by a Sunday newspaper as saying he hadinstructed O'Donoghue to move off the rail at the four-furlong markerto let him through, but Murtagh said today those comments were "jazzedup in the heat of the moment".
The panel ruled that the conversation between the two ridersresulted in Murtagh breaching Rule 220 (iii) in that he acted "in amanner which in the opinion of the BHA is prejudicial to the properconduct of horseracing in Great Britain."
In light of O'Donoghue's breach, the panel ruled that O'Brien hadfailed to give adequate instruction to his jockeys regarding teamtactics but that there was no question of cheating.
|