|
This article is completely rubbish...<br />
<br />
putting aside the content (which I also believe is rubbish), everyone knows which trainer that "this writer" is talking about, but the writer still uses the term "這位練馬師", it shows how gutless that "this writer" is and that he is a complete "little person"<br />
<br />
on the content:<br />
<br />
1. as rightly pointed out by others, Allen was even worse, most of the time, the favourite would lose, but no one never complained, they would simply say that he was a great trainer and can do things that other can't...why target JM?<br />
<br />
2. "就青出於藍勝於藍" - completely no meaning at all...<br />
<br />
3. 即使在聘有主帥的時候，外人也經常捉錯用神，主帥養傷的日子就更遑論了 - that is because you are not good enough, please just admits it...<br />
<br />
4. 這班觀操客的馬齡是二十年起碼，日日看住馬匹操練多多少少也比一般人知多一些，但還是異口同聲講個服字，可見拆局之難。當然以態論馬絕非選馬的唯一法門，故大家或者可以尋到一些更成功的方法，那就祝各位好運了。- rubbish: 1. there are of course a lot of matters that need to consider other than 以態論馬; 2. most of the horses of JM, whether they are fancied or not, will have basic form, and that's why some less fancied horses from JM may/can indeed win...<br />
<br />
|
