原帖由 maxilopez 於 15/11/2010 12:21 AM 發表
講得多都煩,我主要係想講我對大摩訓練,部署閒話一句極度不滿.輸就一早估計到.但你話係人為因素輸定還是其他原因.點講都無最終結論! 作為一個練馬師有好馬係手責任係儘量為馬匹爭取最高榮譽,為馬主爭取最大利益. ...
frankly, you are becoming out of your mind...everyone knows that Irian's form is better, and Collection used this race as a means to improve its form...you personally assume that a 80% Collection will beat a 95% Irian. When it turns out that it is not the case, you started to complain about the trainer and the jockey....what do you want? You want a horse to be 100% on each of the races that it runs...it is a horse, not a machine...
By the way, whatelse can Beadman do in this race? Yesterday's races (at the least in the first few) clearly favoured the front-runners and the inside rail. With a "good" barrier, Beadman decided to put the horse in a little bit forward position than usual (unlike in the QEII Cup where he put the horse to the back and was severely criticised)...and then he caught traffic in the straight. What can he do, jumping over the horses???
Some complained that why didn't he tried to get to the outside at the turn? If so, I think we are watching at different races. There are simply no room outside.
I think everyone has the right to critiise others and has different opinions. However, please get all (or at least most of) the facts right before doing so.
People cannot start complaining by simply looking at the results...last time when the horse was beaten for coming from behind and outside, they complaint why it did not go forward and to the inside...now the horse lost when going forward and stayed in the inside rail, they complaint why it did not go to the outside...there are other horses in a race, you cannot always pick the spot as you wish...
[
本帖最後由 uidiot 於 15/11/2010 07:21 AM 編輯 ]